Skip to content

Picking building management software shouldn't become another committee project

If you're a time-poor committee member or building manager, here's the bad news: there are dozens of systems to choose from. The good news is you don't need to become a software procurement expert. We've done the awkward comparison work for you.

An owners committee and building manager reviewing a software evaluation scorecard together

Here's what else is out there

We're happy to list the alternatives. Compare pricing and the everyday work around maintenance, communication, contractors and reporting, then decide what fits your building.

PlatformPrimary areaWhat the comparison coversComparison
MYBOSBuilding managementCompare building management features including cases, broadcasts, reporting and contractor inductions.Onsite vs MYBOS
BuildingLinkBuilding managementCompare building operations, contractor workflows, reporting, data hosting and API access.Onsite vs BuildingLink
More comparisons
WE WumboBuilding managementCompare building management pricing, reporting, AI assistance and everyday usability.Onsite vs WE Wumbo
Erin LivingResident experienceCompare asset and contractor management, reporting, API access and building operations.Onsite vs Erin Living
MiMORBuilding communicationCompare communication and booking tools with contractor, asset and reporting workflows.Onsite vs MiMOR
ArcSiteBuilding operationsCompare amenity bookings, contractor sign-in, work orders, asset management and reporting.Onsite vs ArcSite
BuildingManager.comBuilding managementCompare asset management, contractor management, reporting, API access and pricing.Onsite vs BuildingManager.com
Cirrus8Property managementCompare building operations with property management workflows such as rent rolls and trust accounting.Onsite vs Cirrus8
ComtyLinkBuilding managementCompare pricing, maintenance, inspections, contractor workflows, resident tools and AI assistance.Onsite vs ComtyLink
MEX MaintenanceMaintenance managementCompare maintenance software with property, occupant and communication workflows.Onsite vs MEX Maintenance
PropertyMeProperty managementCompare facilities and portfolio management with rent roll and trust accounting workflows.Onsite vs PropertyMe
StrataBoxStrata managementCompare strata meeting tools with maintenance, work orders, communication and asset management.Onsite vs StrataBox
Urbanise FMFacilities managementCompare facilities management pricing, integrations and day-to-day building workflows.Onsite vs Urbanise FM

A weighted scorecard for your shortlist

Score each system from 1 to 5 against the same criteria. Ease of use carries as much weight as the core feature set because software that creates more administration isn't doing its job.

Download the fillable PDF scorecard One four-provider matrix, one decision page and no spreadsheet setup.
Evaluation criterionSuggested weightWhat to test
Core functionality25%Maintenance, work orders, contractors, assets, communication and reporting.
Ease of use and admin burden25%How quickly people can learn it and whether it removes duplicate entry and follow-up.
Company, team and support15%Visible people, relevant experience, customer references and access to a real support team.
Security and reliability10%Hosting, access controls, backups, incident response and evidence of reliable operation.
Migration and implementation10%A realistic migration plan, onboarding help, training and a clear path to go live.
Total cost15%Subscription, setup, migration, support and any charges that appear after year one.
Total100%Adjust the weights before scoring if your building has different priorities.

For each criterion: rating ÷ 5 × weight. Add the weighted results for a score out of 100. If nobody can tell you who's behind the product, save yourself the arithmetic.

What matters when you're choosing a system

A long feature list is easy to produce. A system that handles the essential work reliably, without giving your committee or building manager even more administration, is much harder.

1. It should be excellent at the core work

Start with maintenance requests, work orders, contractors, assets, resident records, communication and reporting. These are the jobs the system needs to handle every week. If completing them requires extra spreadsheets, duplicate entry or someone constantly chasing the software, the software has missed the point.

2. You should know who's behind it

Look for a real company, a visible team, named people and clear support details. Building records need to be available for years, through committee changes and management handovers. You probably don't want your building to be the guinea pig for somebody's weekend side project.

3. Track record beats a promising roadmap

Ask how long the platform has been operating, where its team is based, who already uses it and what happens when you need help. Check whether the company can migrate your records, explain its security and let you export your data. A confident demo is useful. Evidence is better.

4. Industry support is worth checking

Independent industry organisations won't choose software for you, but their support is a useful signal that a provider is visible and engaged in the sector it serves.

For the record, here's who we are

Onsite launched in 2023 and now supports buildings and building management companies across Australia and New Zealand. We're an Australian company with a visible team combining decades of experience in software and building management. You can meet the people behind Onsite before you trust us with your building's records.

Onsite is an OCN trusted partner and is supported by the Body Corporate Communities Group in New Zealand.

Why are we listing our competitors?

Because we're proud of what we've built, and pretending the other systems don't exist wouldn't make this decision any easier for you. Some platforms will suit particular buildings better than others. We think Onsite is the best fit for teams that want the core work done properly without adding more work around it.

When you're ready, you can see our pricing, meet the team or try Onsite. No giant sales pitch required.